top of page

The Troubling Allure of Literary Relationships

By Sampurna Chakraborty

2nd Year, BA English Honours


                          Edited & designed by: Ayushi Rani
Edited & designed by: Ayushi Rani
"I am no pilot; yet wert thou as far as that vast shore washed with the farthest sea, I would adventure for such merchandise". (Romeo and Juliet, Act2, Scene2)

 

For a heart like mine that swoons over mushy romances, books have forever been my escape from the daunting reality into a land of enchanting fictional amour.

From Romeo Juliet’s eternal love to Rochester and Jane’s spiritual bond, the realm of literature has been said to set standards of love that has been celebrated by readers all over the globe. However, if you try to dissect these relationships, (I suggest you don't, why ruin it when it can keep feeding your delusions 😉) certain aspects of it have been quite problematic.

 

Take Odysseus and Penelope's apparent steadfast loyalty for instance. When Odysseus was away for 20 years striving to return home to his wife, his chaste wife Penelope was pining for him, fending off all the suitors! A perfect trope for epitomising complete devotion in love.  But if you read a little more about it you'll realize that while Penelope, a doting wife, yearns for her husband, Odysseus engages in numerous infidelities to achieve his goal.  Does this not make you think about the inherent double standards of Greek society, the uneven power dynamics in their relationship?

 

How about we discuss Romeo and Juliet, upheld as the romantic ideal. What can be problematic about their relationship?! Dying for love, fighting with the world just to be united, isn't that what love is all about? But I hate to break it to you, NO, that's not it. The lovers concerned are teenagers. Killing yourself after six days of thwarted infatuation, risking family name, reputation and life is just nonsensical. Their actions are more reckless than romantic.

 

In Jane Eyre too, Rochester seems to be blindly in love with Jane. But again what is ostensibly so romantic, is in reality a lot harsher. Rochester is rude, manipulative, he conveniently lies about his marriage with Bertha and when Jane discovers the secret, he divulges the truth about his bigamy under the pretext of having a mad wife! And let's not forget how he leads Miss Ingram on just to make Jane jealous. If this isn't being a red flag, what is!

 

Even contemporary literature has more often than not hidden toxic masculinity, controversial tropes behind romantic facades. As we continue reading love stories that make us giddy and smile from ear to ear, let's not forget to critique these debatable elements instead of blindly romanticising them.


Edward Cullen will be maddeningly, unconditionally and irrevocably in love with you if you leave nice comments below <3

 



11 則留言

評等為 0(最高為 5 顆星)。
暫無評等

新增評等
訪客
1月19日
評等為 5(最高為 5 顆星)。

The design and the content is fabulous 🤩

按讚

Ragini
1月19日
評等為 5(最高為 5 顆星)。

What a write-up Sampurna! 💗

Fabulous designing AyushiAyushi😃

按讚

Vanshita Sharma
1月19日
評等為 5(最高為 5 顆星)。

Ate - both the design and the content 👏👏👏👏👏

按讚

訪客
1月18日

Really interesting the way u have looked into these ..

按讚

Ayushi Rani
Ayushi Rani
1月18日
評等為 5(最高為 5 顆星)。

Loving the discussions that this post elicits... keep it coming guys❤❤

按讚
forblog.png

Did You Know?

The word library comes from Latin liber – the inner bark of trees – and was first used in written form in the 14th century.

Let the posts
come to you.

Thanks for submitting!

Let us know what's on your mind

Thanks for submitting!

© 2022 Bookmarked

bottom of page