The Dynamic Faces of Frankenstein

Written by Ayushi Sharma

edited by Vanshika

Frankenstein by Mary Shelly is perhaps the one and only universally acclaimed masterpiece that is often misunderstood by those who haven’t read it. However this very saddening truth is what brings to light its main concept- people judging everything without truly grasping them; this fact is tragic in a beautiful way.

The reason I have chosen “ Frankenstein” for the theme of ‘Cinematic Fridays’ is because it has had five powerful movie adaptations. These iconic movie adaptations have stirred heated debates, artistic praises and constructive criticisms. It's fascinating how these diverse movies have focused on different themes despite arising from the same piece of work. The very first adaptation of it by James Whale focused on scientific overreach and moral responsibility. Its 2015 adaptation by Paul McGuigan reflected upon poignant concepts like friendship and redemption; it focused on Igor’s point of view which is not present in the novel. Another adaptation of it, ‘Young Frankenstein’ directed by Mel Brooks, ironically, was a comical homage to this heartbreaking work. It beautifully blended parodical sense and comedy and genuine humanization of both the scientist and his creature. Its 1994 adaptation by Kenneth Branagh is considered to be most emotionally disrupting and is considered most faithful to the novel. While ‘The Curse of Frankenstein’, its 1957 adaptation by Terence Fisher emphasized ambition and obsession.

I am fondly intrigued by how this novel’s deep complexity fuses with gothic horror and moral responsibility. The movie adaptations may not have as perfectly captured the story as Mary Shelly’s words did, but their cinematography and artistic filmography brought to light a different view of looking at this work. All in all, Frankenstein in its ample deferring forms continues to dominate literary and cinematic discussions, making us reflect upon ourselves, humanity, scientific development and profuse perspectives.